Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cem Ilkel vs Shuichi Sekiguchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ilkel vs Sekiguchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Cem Ilkel vs Shuichi Sekiguchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Sekiguchi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilkel has won 46.71% of points on their second serve, while Sekiguchi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilkel, in recent form, has won 50.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sekiguchi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.25% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilkel has saved 51.97% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sekiguchi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilkel has won 39.22% of matches played (W/L 20/ 31), with Sekiguchi winning 69.23% (W/L 18/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9). Sekiguchi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 12/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20), where as Sekiguchi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.73% of matches (W/L 16/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilkel winning 1 times and Sekiguchi being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Sekiguchi winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Sekiguchi was at the St. Petersburg 1 Challenger, 01-03-2021, First, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:5:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ilkel and Sekiguchi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ilkel winning 0 times and Sekiguchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ilkel winning 0, and Sekiguchi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 233.96 while Sekiguchi has played against players with an average rank of 251.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilkel has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sekiguchi has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilkel has converted 39.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sekiguchi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
407
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
643
Rank
259
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
56% (401-315)
Career Total W/L
60% (402-271)
36% (9-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$225,530
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Shuichi Sekiguchi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:5:51 | 1:5:51 |
| 1st Serve % | 43% (20/46) | 70% (33/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (14/20) | 70% (23/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 69% (18/26) | 21% (3/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (21/47) | 30% (14/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cem Ilkel | Shuichi Sekiguchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (9/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 36% (20/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (219/281) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 53 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 190.92 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (879/1532) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (610/879) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (305/653) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (38/97) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (505/1447) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (8/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (15/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Shuichi Sekiguchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kokoro Isomura
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
82%
(
76 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
90 of
130)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
37 of
76)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
29%
(
8 of
28)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
67 of
130)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
37%
(
38 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kazuki Nishiwaki
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Ryota Tanuma
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
49%
(
53 of
108)
3
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
115
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Chase Ferguson
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilkel Vs Sekiguchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Ilkel are available here and Sekiguchi photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
